4.7 Article

Purification and characterization of chitosanase from Bacillus cereus D-11

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 513-520

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.025

Keywords

Bacillus cereus D-II; chitosanase; antifungal activity; glycoside hydrolase family 8; degree of deacetylation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A chitosanase-producing bacterium was isolated from Taiwan soils and identified as Bacillus cereus D-II based on the biochemical properties and 16S rRNA gene sequence. The optimal medium for enzyme production consisted of 0.7% colloidal chitosan, 1% yeast extract, and 1% NaCl at an initial pH of 7.0 with 0.5% inoculation concentration (1.4 x 10(8) CFU/ml). After cultivation at 30 degrees C for 3 days, the maximal activity of 4.85 U/ml was observed. An extracellular chitosanase produced from B cereus D-11 was concentrated by lyophilization and purified by Sephadex G- 150 gel filtration and CM-Sephadex ion exchange column chromatography. The molecular weight of the purified chitosanase was estimated to be 41 kDa by 12.5% SDS-PAGE. The optimal pH and temperature for the chitosanase were 6.0 and 60 degrees C, respectively. The enzyme was stable below 50 degrees C and from pH 5 to 10. N-terminal amino acid sequence exhibited highest homology to the chitosanases belonging to glycoside hydrolase family 8. The enzyme was inhibited by 10 mM 2-liydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl bromide but activated by phenylglyoxal and chloramine T. The K-m and V-max values were 7.5 mg/ml and 2.15 x 10(-7) Mol/Mg/s for soluble chitosan (degree of deacetylation, DD 86%) as substrate. The D-II chitosanase degraded chitosan with DD ranging from 70% to 100%, but did not degrade chitin. The most susceptible substrate was 86% deacetylated chitosan. Furthermore, the D-11 chitosanase inhibited the mycelial growth of Rhizoctonia solani on PDA medium. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available