4.2 Article

Reaction mechanism of dicofol removal by cellulase

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 22-28

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.015

Keywords

Dicofol; Cellulase; Endo-glucanases activity; Oxidative degradation; OH free radical

Funding

  1. special fund provided by the State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control (Peking University) [09Z02ESPCP]
  2. Special Research Funding for Public Benefit Industries from National Ministry of Environmental Protection [201209020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It remains unclear whether dicofol should be defined as a persistent organic pollutant. Its environmental persistence has gained attention. This study focused on its degradation by cellulase. Cellulase was separated using a gel chromatogram, and its degradation activity towards dicofol involved its endoglucanase activity. By analyzing the kinetic parameters of cellulase reacting with mixed substrates, it was shown that cellulase reacted on dicofol and carboxyl methyl cellulose through two different active centers. Thus, the degradation of dicofol was shown to be an oxidative process by cellulase. Next, by comparing the impacts of tert-butyl alcohol (a typical OH free-radical inhibitor) on the removal efficiencies of dicofol under both cellulase and Fenton reagent systems, it was shown that the removal of dicofol was initiated by OH free radicals produced by cellulase. Finally, 4,4'-dichloro-dibenzophenone and chloride were detected using gas chromatography mass spectrometry and ion chromatography analysis, which supported our hypothesis. The reaction mechanism was analyzed and involved an attack by OH free radicals at the orthocarbon of dicofol, resulting in the degradation product 4,4'-dichloro-dibenzophenone. (C) 2015 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available