4.6 Review

What is the optimal therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who progress on an initial VEGFr-TKI?

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 366-374

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2012.06.010

Keywords

Anticancer therapy; Axitinib; Everolimus; Kidney cancer; Mechanism of action; Metastatic disease; Resistance; Sequential therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Novartis
  4. Pfizer
  5. Roche
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sequential treatment with targeted therapies is the current standard of care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Most patients are initially treated with a first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI), but will eventually develop resistance and subsequent disease progression. Patients with mRCC whose disease progresses during initial VEGFr-TKI therapy may continue treatment with a different VEGFr-TKI or they may switch to treatment with a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor which has a different mechanism of action. Based on positive results of the phase III RECORD-1 trial, clinical guidelines in the United States and Europe recommend use of everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in patients with VEGFr-TKI-refractory mRCC. Positive results of the phase III AXIS trial led to recent approval in the United States of the VEGFr-TKI axitinib for use in patients with mRCC who failed one previous therapy. VEGFr-TKIs and mTOR inhibitors have distinct clinical effects with differing safety profiles, but to date, no head-to-head comparisons in the post-VEGFr-TKI second-line setting are available. This review discusses multiple factors that should be considered when selecting a second-line therapy for patients with VEGFr-TKI-refractory mRCC, including evidence-based guidelines, efficacy, safety, patient profile, and clinician familiarity with available agents. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available