4.6 Review

Hyperbaric oxygenation for tumour sensitisation to radiotherapy: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 577-591

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.01.001

Keywords

Hyperbaric oxygenation; Radiotherapy; Tumour sensitisation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Radiotherapy is a well-established treatment for some solid tumours. Hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) may improve radiotherapeutic kitting of hypoxic cancer cells, so the simultaneous administration of radiotherapy and HBO may reduce mortality and tumour recurrence. Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature in September 2007 for randomised controlled trials, and made pooled analyses of pre-determined clinical outcomes. Results: Nineteen trials contributed to this review (2286 patients). There was a reduction in mortality for head and neck cancers at one and five years after therapy (at five years RR 0.82, P = 0.03, NNT = 5), and improved local tumour control at three months (RR 0.58, P = 0.006, NNT = 7). Any advantage is achieved at the cost of an increased rate of both severe radiation tissue injury (RR 2.35, P < 0.0001, NNH = 8) and the chance of seizures during therapy (RR 6.76, P = 0.03, NNH = 22). Conclusions: There is some evidence that HBO improves local tumour control and mortality for cancers of the head and neck, and local tumour recurrence in cancers of the uterine cervix. These benefits may only occur with unusual fractionation schemes. HBO is associated with significant adverse effects including oxygen toxic seizures and severe radiation tissue injury. The methodological and reporting inadequacies of the studies included in this review demand a cautious interpretation. More research is needed for head, neck and uterine cervical cancer, but is probably not justified for bladder cancer. There is little evidence available concerning malignancies at other sites. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available