4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Bone boss in patients with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors and associated treatment strategies

Journal

CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages S31-S42

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.03.005

Keywords

aromatase inhibitor; bisphosphonate; breast cancer; cancer treatment-induced bone loss; osteoporosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal. women is treated increasingly with aromatase inhibitors because of increased efficacy and reduced incidence of endometrial. cancer compared with tamoxifen. However, aromatase inhibitor therapy increases bone turnover as a result of nearly complete oestrogen depletion, leading to increases in bone toss and fragility fractures that erode patients' functional independence and quality of life. Management of patients with aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL) is currently evolving and intervention strategies are under investigation. Although no treatments are specifically approved for AIBL, bisphosphonates are currently the intervention of choice for patients with low bone mineral density or evidence of rapid bone turnover, along with adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation and a healthy lifestyle. In this setting, the majority of information available regarding bisphosphonate efficacy is from studies of intravenous zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 6 months. Data from four large international. studies (three of identical design in postmenopausal women and one in premenopausal women) indicate that zoledronic acid is effective in the management of AIBL. Treatment algorithms based on risk factors and bone mineral. density are under development, and the results of ongoing studies should help define optimal bone health management for,patients undergoing aromatase inhibitor treatment for early breast cancer. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available