4.2 Article

Combined treatment of olive mill wastewater by Fenton's reagent and anaerobic biological process

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2015.975065

Keywords

olive mill wastewater; Monod model kinetic study; chemical oxidation; Fenton's reagent; Anaerobic biological treatment; combined treatment

Funding

  1. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (Portugal) [PEst-C/QUI/UI0616/2014]
  2. Project INNOFOOD - INNOvation in the FOOD sector through the valorisation of food and agro-food by-products [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-0000029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work presents the application of Fenton's reagent process combined with anaerobic digestion to treat an olive mill wastewater (OMW). Firstly, OMW was pre-treated by chemical oxidation in a batch reactor with Fenton's reagent, using a fixed H2O2/COD ratio of 0.20, pH = 3.5 and a H2O2/Fe2+ molar ratio of 15:1. This advanced oxidation treatment allowed reaching reductions of 17.6 and 82.5% of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total polyphenols (TP), respectively. Secondly, OMW treatment by anaerobic digestion was performed using previously adapted microorganisms immobilized in Sepiolite. These biological tests were carried out varying the substrate concentration supplied to the reactor and COD conversions from 52 to 74% were obtained. Afterwards, Fenton's reagent followed by anaerobic digestion was applied to OMW treatment. This combined process presented a significant improvement on organic load removal, reaching COD degradations from 64 to 88%. Beyond the pollutant load removal, it was also monitored the yield of methane generated throughout anaerobic experiments. The methane produced ranged from 281cm(3) to 322cm(3) of CH4/g COD removed. Additionally, a methane generation kinetic study was performed using the Monod Model. The application of this model allowed observing a kinetic constant increase of the combined process (k(FN) = 0.036h(-1)) when compared to the single anaerobic process (k(F) = 0.017h(-1)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available