4.5 Review

Cellular context-dependent colors of transforming growth factor-β signaling

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages 306-312

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01441.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. KAKENHI
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  3. University of Tokyo
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta signaling has interesting characteristics in the context of cancer. Although perturbations of TGF-beta signaling are strongly implicated in cancer progression, TGF-beta signaling has both tumor-suppressive and tumor-promoting effects. For example, TGF-beta inhibits cancer cell proliferation in some cellular contexts, but promotes it in others. Although several approaches to treating cancer have been considered using TGF-beta-based therapeutic strategies, the contradictory behaviors of TGF-beta have made these approaches complex. To put them to practical use, either the tumor-suppressive or tumor-promoting arm needs to be specifically manipulated. However, there is virtually no method to specifically regulate a certain cell response induced by TGF-beta. In this review, we first consider the basic machinery of TGF-beta signaling, and describe several cell responses induced by TGF-beta stimulation in specific contexts. Mechanisms by which TGF-beta can induce several responses in a cellular context-dependent fashion are discussed with established paradigms and models. We also address perspectives on the specific control of only a subset of numerous cell responses induced by TGF-beta stimulation. Such methods will aid specific regulation of either the tumor-suppressive or tumor-promoting arm of the TGF-beta pathway and in realization of TGF-beta-based treatment of malignant tumors. (Cancer Sci 2010; 101: 306-312).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available