4.6 Article

Placental abruption in the United States, 1979 through 2001: Temporal trends and potential determinants

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 192, Issue 1, Pages 191-198

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.087

Keywords

abruption

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD038902] Funding Source: Medline
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD038902] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in abruption risk and to assess how much underlying changes in the clinical determinants may have affected these trends. Study design: We used the National Hospital Discharge Summary data (1919-2001). an annual Survey of sampled non-federal, short stay. general. and specialty hospitals in the United States. Trends in abruption were assessed for the periods 1979 through 1981 and 1999 through 2001. Clinical determinants of abruption that were evaluated included hypertensive diseases, anemia, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture, of membranes. chorioamnionitis, oligohydramnios, obstetric shock/trauma, uterine tumors. short umbilical cord, and velamentous cord insertion. Temporal trends in abruption were examined before and after adjustment for determinants through multivariable logistic regression. Results: The rate of abruption increased 92% (95% CL 88 96) among black women between 1979-1981 (0.76%; n = 13,584 women) and 1999-2001 (1.43%; n = 18,960 women). Among white women, the rate increased by 15% (95% CL 14,16) over the same period. from 0.82% (n = 66,186 women) in 1979-1981 to 0.94% (n = 59.284 women) in 1999-2001. The determinants that were associated with trends in abruption included anemia. gestational diabetes mellitus. preterm labor, short umbilical cord, and velamentous cord insertion, although their effects varied substantially by maternal race. Conclusion: The temporal increase in rates of abruption may reflect a true increase in risk or may be the result of improved diagnosis of both abruption and its determinants. Although the cause of abruption is still speculative, the trend-is of concern and deserves scrutiny. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available