4.5 Article

Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1-specific CD4+ T cells directly kill Epstein-Barr virus-carrying natural killer and T cells

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages 1633-1642

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00852.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17590428, 18591212]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Sports [17016089, 18015053]
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor, Welfare and Technology, Japan [16-17, 18S-1]
  4. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan, and a Research Grant from the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund. [26]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18591212, 17590428, 17016089, 18015053] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen (EBNA)1 is expressed in every EBV-infected cell, regardless of the state of EBV infection. Although EBNA1 is thought to be a promising antigen for immunotherapy of all EBV-associated malignancies, it is less clear whether EBNA1-specific CD4(+) T cells can act as direct effectors. Herein, we investigated the ability of CD4(+) T-cell clones induced with overlapping peptides covering the C-terminal region of EBNA1, and identified minimal epitopes and their restricted major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Of these, a novel epitope, EYHQEGGPD, was found to be presented by DRB1*0401, 0403 and 0406. Five CD4(+) T-cell clones recognized endogenously processed and presented antigens on EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL) and one example proved capable of killing EBV-carrying natural killer (NK) and T-cell lines derived from patients with chronic active EBV infection (CAEBV). Identification of minimal epitopes facilitates design of peptide-based vaccines and our data suggest that EBNA1-specific CD4(+) T cells may play roles as direct effectors for immunotherapy targeting EBV-carrying NK and T-cell malignancies. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 1633-1642)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available