4.5 Article

Prognostic impact and immunogenicity of a novel osteosarcoma antigen, papillomavirus binding factor, in patients with osteosarcoma

Journal

CANCER SCIENCE
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages 368-375

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00695.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To develop peptide-based immunotherapy for osteosarcoma, we previously identified papillomavirus binding factor (PBF) as a cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL)-defined osteosarcoma antigen in the context of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B55. In the present study, we analyzed the distribution profile of PBF in 83 biopsy specimens of osteosarcomas and also the prognostic impact of PBF expression in 78 patients with osteosarcoma who had completed the standard treatment protocols. Next, we determined the antigenic peptides from PBF that react with peripheral T lymphocytes of HLA-A24(+) patients with osteosarcoma. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that 92% of biopsy specimens of osteosarcoma expressed PBF. PBF-positive osteosarcoma conferred significantly poorer prognosis than those with negative expression of PBF (P = 0.025). In accordance with the Bioinformatics and Molecular Analysis Section score, we synthesized 10 peptides from the PBF sequence. Subsequent screening with an HLA class I stabilization assay revealed that peptide PBF A24.2 had the highest affinity to HLA-A24. CD8(+) T cells reacting with a PBF A24.2 peptide were detected in eight of nine HLA-A24-positive patients with osteosarcoma at the frequency from 5 x 10(-7) to 7 x 10(-6) using limiting dilution/mixed lymphocyte peptide culture followed by tetramer-based frequency analysis. PBF A24.2 peptide induced CTL lines from an HLA-A24-positive patient, which specifically killed an osteosarcoma cell line that expresses both PBF and HLA-A24. These findings suggested prognostic significance and immunodominancy of PBF in patients with osteosarcoma. PBF is the candidate target for immunotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available