4.7 Article

Establishment, value assignment, and characterization of new WHO reference reagents for six molecular forms of human chorionic gonadotropin

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 177-182

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.038679

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) established a Working Group to investigate means of improving the comparability of immunoassays for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), which was selected as a prototype glycoprotein analyte. The Working Group identified development of unambiguous nomenclature and production of new highly purified International Reference Reagents calibrated in substance concentrations as its primary objectives. Methods: Preparations of intact hCG, nicked hCG, hCG beta-subunit, nicked hCG beta-subunit, hCG a-subunit, and hCG beta-core fragment were purified from a crude urinary hCG preparation, ampouled, lyophilized, and assigned values in substance concentrations (mol/L). Value assignment and accelerated degradation studies were carried out in accordance with WHO protocols for International Reference Reagents. Results: The ampouled standards were assigned final values based on the recovery of immunoreactive material after reconstitution. The degradation studies showed that the standards were highly stable. Conclusions: The nomenclature of hCG-related molecules and immunoassays has been adopted by the IFCC, and the standards prepared and characterized by the Working Group have been formally adopted by the WHO as the First International Reference Reagents for six hCG-related molecules. These developments will enable better understanding of what assays for hCG measure and should ultimately help to improve the clinical application of these assays. (C) 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available