4.7 Article

Purification of Enterocytozoon bieneusi from stools and production of specific antibodies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 387-392

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.387-392.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R21 AI052792, R21AI52792, R01AI43196] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P01 DK055510, P01DK55510] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R21AI052792, R01AI043196] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P01DK055510] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enterocytozoon bieneusi is clinically the most significant of the microsporidia in humans, causing chronic diarrhea wasting and cholangitis in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus infection and AIDS. Little progress on this infection has been made because of the inability to propagate E. bieneusi in vitro and in vivo, which limits the source of parasite spores to the stools of infected human patients. Given the size and shape of the E. bieneusi spores (1.1 to 1.6 by 0.7 to 1.0 mum) and the lack of specific immune reagents, the identification and purification of large quantities of spores from feces are technically challenging. Consequently, diagnosis relies entirely on PCR, a labor-intensive approach that requires highly skilled personnel. We describe a method for the purification of E. bieneusi spores from human stools and the production of rabbit-specific antisera. Spores were purified by a combination of isopycnic Percoll gradient centrifugation and continuous sucrose gradient centrifugation. Specific polyclonal antibodies raised in mice and rabbits reacted by indirect immunofluorescence with E. bieneusi but not with Encephalitozoon spp., Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, or other forms present in human stools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available