4.5 Article

Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum dhfr and dhps genes and age related in vivo sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in malaria-infected patients from Nigeria

Journal

ACTA TROPICA
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages 183-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.06.015

Keywords

malaria; Plasmodium falciparum; dhfr; dhps; sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance; Nigeria

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R03TW006298-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [R03TW006298] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (dhps) genes have been used as means to predict treatment failure to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and for monitoring/surveillance of resistance to the drug in many areas where malaria is endemic. However, patients responses to treatment are significantly dependent on factors like host immunity profile of treated patients. In order to investigate the relationship between molecular markers of SP resistance, host immunity and clinical outcome, the association between pre-treatment dhfr and dhps genotypes, age and treatment outcomes was evaluated in 109 children treated with SP for acute uncomplicated malaria in Ibadan, Nigeria. Seventy-three percent of the children were cured with the drug, while 27% failed treatment after 28 days of follow-up. All children infected with parasites harboring less than two dhfr/dhps mutations were cured with SP. The dhfr triple (Asn-108[Ile-51/Arg-59) mutants or the dhps double mutants (Gly-437/Glu-540) were independently associated with SP treatment failure in children aged less than 5 years, but not in older children. The dhfr and dhps quintuple mutant (dhfr triple mutant + dhps double mutant) was the genotype most strongly associated with SP treatment failure (OR = 24.72, 95%CI = 8.24-74.15) in both younger and older children. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available