4.5 Article

D1-like and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists administered into the shell subregion of the rat nucleus accumbens decrease cocaine, but not food, reinforcement

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages 959-968

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.06.048

Keywords

eticlopride; L-750,667; progressive ratio; self-administration; SCH-23390; U99194A

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [F30DA014205, R01DA015214] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [F30 DA014205, R01 DA15214, F30 DA14205] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cocaine self-administration experiments were designed to assess the respective roles of D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptors in the ventral forebrain in cocaine reinforcement. D1-like or D2-like dopamine receptor antagonists were microinjected into the nucleus accumbens core, nucleus accumbens shell, neostriatum or lateral septum prior to sessions in which cocaine was self-administered under a progressive ratio schedule by rats. The results indicated that administration of a D1/5 (SCH-23390) or a D2/D3/D4 (eticlopride), but not a D3 (U99194A) or D4 (L-750,667), dopamine receptor antagonist into the core and shell of the nucleus accumbens decreased the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine. However, in control experiments intra-accumbal core administration of SCH-23390 or eticlopride decreased food self-administration, whereas administration of these drugs into the accumbens shell had no effect on food reinforcement. Neither SCH-23390 nor eticlopride influenced cocaine reinforcement when administered into the neostriatum or lateral septum. Collectively, these results indicate that D1-like and D2 dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell selectively modulate the reinforcing efficacy of cocaine, whereas D1-like and D2 dopamine receptors in the accumbens core have a more general influence on reinforced behaviors. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IBRO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available