4.5 Article

Reversal of the circadian expression of tyrosine-hydroxylase but not nitric oxide synthase levels in the spinal cord of dopamine D-3 receptor knockout mice

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 133, Issue 2, Pages 353-357

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.002

Keywords

dopamine; circadian; restless legs syndrome; spinal cord; sleep disorder; animal model

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS045248] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS045248-01A1, R01 NS045248-04, R01 NS045248-03, NS045248, R01 NS045248-02, R01 NS045248] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circadlan rhythms have been described for numerous transmitter synthesizing enzymes in the brain but rarely in spinal cord. We measured spinal tyrosine-hydroxylase (TH) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) levels in the thoracic intermediolateral nucleus, the location of sympathetic preganglionic neurons, in male wild type (WT) and dopamine D-3 receptor knockout mice (D3KO). TH and NOS levels both displayed circadian patterns in WT and D3KO animals with overall reduced TH and increased NOS expression in the D3KO mice. The circadian pattern of NOS expression was similar in WT and D3KO mice. In contrast, TH expression was Inverted in D3KO mice, with TH levels consistently lower than in WT throughout the day, but strongly increased temporarily I h prior to daylight. TH is the rate-limiting enzyme for the production of dopamine. Spinal dopamine dysfunction is implicated in a sleep disorder called restless legs syndrome (RLS). RLS follows a circadian rhythm and is relieved clinically by dopamine D-3 receptor agonists. Our observations of an altered circadian pattern in spinal dopamine synthesis in D3KO animals may provide insight into putative dopaminergic mechanisms contributing to RLS. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IBRO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available