4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Phosphorus removal from synthetic and municipal wastewater using spent alum sludge

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 10-11, Pages 525-532

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0732

Keywords

phosphorus removal; spent alum sludge; wastewater treatment; water treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, phosphorus removal was studied using as coagulant spent alum sludge from a water treatment plant of EYDAP (Athens Water Supply and Sewerage Company) and compared to alum (Al-2(SO4)(3)center dot 18H(2)O), iron chloride (FeCl3 center dot 7H(2)O), iron sulfate (Fe-2(SO4)10H(2)O) and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)(2)) at a constant pH (equal to 6).The comparison was based on their efficiency to remove phosphorus in synthetic wastewater consisting of 10 mg/L P as potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 50 mg/L N as ammonium chloride. The experiments were carried out using a jar-test apparatus and the measurements were performed according to the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Pure alum, iron chloride and iron sulfate were much more efficient in phosphorus removal than the spent alum sludge but in the case of calcium hydroxide, phosphorus removal was very low in pH = 6. Specifically, orthophosphate were totally removed by alum using 15 mg/L as Al, by alum sludge using 75 mg/L as Al and by FeCl3 center dot 7H(2)O or Fe-2(SO4)center dot 10H(2)O using 30 mg/L of Fe while in the case of calcium hydroxide P removal was actually zero. pH measurements showed that the uptake of phosphates is associated to the release of OH ions in the solution and that the end of P uptake is accompanied by the stabilization of pH. Finally this spent alum sludge was tested on municipal wastewater and proved to be effective as apart from phosphorus it was shown to remove turbidity and COD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available