Journal
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 152, Issue 6, Pages A1142-A1148Publisher
ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.1896526
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Despite the fact that the same coating concentration and annealing temperature are used for MPO4 nanoparticle coatings (M = Al, Fe, Ce, and SrH) on a LiCoO2 cathode, the extent of the coating coverage is influenced by the nanoparticle size or morphology. Nanoparticles (AlPO4 or FePO4) with a size smaller than 20 nm led to the complete encapsulation of LiCoO2, but those with sizes greater than 150 nm (CePO4) or with whisker shapes (SrHPO4) led to partial encapsulation. This difference affected the discharge capacity. The LiCoO2 completely encapsulated with AlPO4 or FePO4 showed the highest discharge capacity of 230 mAh/g at 4.8 and 3 V at a rate of 0.1 C (= 18 mA/g), which diminished with decreasing coating coverage in the order of Al similar to Fe < SrH < Ce < bare cathode. However, the capacity retention during cycling increased in the order of Al > Ce > SrH > Fe > bare cathode. This is consistent with the capacity retention result obtained at 90 degrees C storage for 4 h. (c) 2005 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/1.1896526] All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available