4.6 Review

Genetic thrombophilias and preeclampsia: A meta-analysis

Journal

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 182-192

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000146250.85561.e9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the factor V Leiden (1691 G-A) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), the methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677 C-T SNP, and the prothrombin 20210 G-A SNP and the risk of preeclampsia, by conducting a meta-analysis of all case-control studies with data on these polymorphisms and the risk of preeclampsia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966 to November 2002), EMBASE (1980 to November 2002). Search terms included preeclampsia, thrombophilia, factor V Leiden, protein C, MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, homocysteine, and prothrombin gene 20210. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Case-control studies of genetic thrombophilias and preeclampsia were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We identified 349 titles and reviewed 47 articles for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies with 7,522 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Data from patients characterized as having severe preeclampsia were extracted and analyzed separately. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the association of factor V Leiden and all cases of preeclampsia was 1.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.87) and 2.24 (95% CI 1.28-3.94) for cases of severe preeclampsia. The pooled OR for the MTHFR 677 TT genotype and all preeclampsia was 1.01 (95% CI 0.79-1.29) and 1.38 (95% CI 0.93-2.06) for severe preeclampsia. The OR for the prothrombin 20210 polymorphism and all preeclampsia was 1.37 (95% CI 0.72-2.57) and 1.98 (.94-4.17) for severe preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the factor V Leiden SNP is associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Further studies are warranted to determine whether subgroups of high-risk women should be screened for this mutation. (Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:182-92. (C) 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available