4.4 Article

Hair-cell versus afferent adaptation in the semicircular canals

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 424-436

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00426.2004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R55-DC-006685, P01-DC-01837, R01 DC006685-02, R01 DC006685, R55 DC006685, P01 DC001837] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [P01DC001837, R01DC006685, R55DC006685] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The time course and extent of adaptation in semicircular canal hair cells was compared to adaptation in primary afferent neurons for physiological stimuli in vivo to study the origins of the neural code transmitted to the brain. The oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau, was used as the experimental model. Afferent firing-rate adaptation followed a double-exponential time course in response to step cupula displacements. The dominant adaptation time constant varied considerably among afferent fibers and spanned six orders of magnitude for the population ( similar to 1 ms to > 1,000 s). For sinusoidal stimuli (0.1 - 20 Hz), the rapidly adapting afferents exhibited a 90degrees phase lead and frequency-dependent gain, whereas slowly adapting afferents exhibited a flat gain and no phase lead. Hair-cell voltage and current modulations were similar to the slowly adapting afferents and exhibited a relatively flat gain with very little phase lead over the physiological bandwidth and dynamic range tested. Semicircular canal microphonics also showed responses consistent with the slowly adapting subset of afferents and with hair cells. The relatively broad diversity of afferent adaptation time constants and frequency-dependent discharge modulations relative to hair-cell voltage implicate a subsequent site of adaptation that plays a major role in further shaping the temporal characteristics of semicircular canal afferent neural signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available