4.4 Article

The Origin and Reversible Nature of Poultry Litter Biochar Hydrophobicity

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 963-971

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.09.0385

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Delaware Department of Transportation
  2. US Department of Education through a GAANN Fellowship
  3. National Science Foundation via NSF-REU program [NSF 13-542]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transient changes in wettability complicate the prediction of biochar's hydrologic effects. Biochar wetting properties were characterized from poultry litter biochar (PLBC) produced from slow pyrolysis at temperatures between 300 and 600 degrees C with water drop penetration time (persistence of hydrophobicity) and contact angle (CA; severity of hydrophobicity) measurements. Hydrophobicity was associated with semivolatile organic compounds coating PLBC surfaces, which resulted in 24.4 carbon layers and CAs of 101.1 +/- 2.9 degrees at a pyrolysis temperature of 300 degrees C but only 0.4 layers of surface coverage and CAs of 20.6 +/- 1.3 degrees when pyrolyzed at 600 degrees C. Mixing PLBC with water removed organic coatings, and storage in water for 72 h decreased CA as much as 81 degrees for the most hydrophobic PLBCs. When mixed with quartz sand of the same particle size, CAs of PLBC-sand mixtures increased from 6.6 +/- 1.4 degrees at 0% PLBC mass fraction to 48.3 +/- 2.0 degrees at 15% mass fraction. Hydrophobic and hydrophilic PLBCs increased CA by nearly identical amounts at 2 and 5% mass fractions, which was explained by the influence of PLBC particle topology on macroscopic surface roughness of PLBC-sand mixtures. For environmentally relevant situations, PLBC-sand mixtures at mass fractions <= 15% remained water wetting. However, all PLBC additions increased CA, which may alter infiltration rates and induce preferential water flow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available