4.7 Article

HapBlock: haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection software using a set of dynamic programming algorithms

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 131-134

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth482

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA100949] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R01RR016522] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG002518, P50HG002790] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES009912] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NCI NIH HHS [U54CA100949] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NCRR NIH HHS [RR16522] Funding Source: Medline
  7. NHGRI NIH HHS [P50 HG 002790, R01-HG02518] Funding Source: Medline
  8. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01ES09912] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have revealed that linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns vary across the human genome with some regions of high LD interspersed with regions of low LD. Such LD patterns make it possible to select a set of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs; tag SNPs) for genome-wide association studies. We have developed a suite of computer programs to analyze the block-like LD patterns and to select the corresponding tag SNPs. Compared to other programs for haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection, our program has several notable features. First, the dynamic programming algorithms implemented are guaranteed to find the block partition with minimum number of tag SNPs for the given criteria of blocks and tag SNPs. Second, both haplotype data and genotype data from unrelated individuals and/or from general pedigrees can be analyzed. Third, several existing measures/criteria for haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection have been implemented in the program. Finally, the programs provide flexibility to include specific SNPs (e.g. non-synonymous SNPs) as tag SNPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available