4.7 Review

From model compounds to protein binding: syntheses, characterizations and fluorescence studies of [Ru-II(bipy)(terpy)L](2+) complexes (bipy=2,2 '-bipyridine; terpy=2,2 ': 6,2 ''-terpyridine; L = imidazole, pyrazole and derivatives, cytochrome c)

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume -, Issue 2, Pages 256-267

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b414999h

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compounds [Ru-II(bipy)(terpy)L](PF6)(2) with bipy = 2,2'-bipyridine, terpy = 2,2':6',2-terpyridine, L = H2O, imidazole (imi), 4-methylimidazole, 2-methylimidazole, benzimidazole, 4,5-diphenylimidazole, indazole, pyrazole, 3-methylpyrazole have been synthesized and characterized by H-1 NMR, ESI-MS and UV/Vis (in CH3CN and H2O). For L = H2O, imidazole, 4,5-diphenylimidazole and indazole the X-ray structures of the complexes have been determined with the crystal packing featuring only few intermolecular C-H...pi or pi-pi interactions due to the separating action of the PF6-anions. Complexes with L = imidazole and 4-methylimidazole exhibit a fluorescence emission with a maximum at 662 and 667 nm, respectively (lambda(exo) = 475 nm, solvent CH3CN or H2O). The substitution of the aqua ligand in [Ru(bipy)(terpy)(H2O)](2+) in aqueous solution by imidazole to give [Ru(bipy)(terpy)(imi)](2+) is fastest at a pH of 8.5 (as followed by the increase in emission intensity). Coupling of the [Ru(bipy)(terpy)](2+) fragment to cytochrome c (Yeast iso-1) starting from the Ru-aqua complex was successful at 35 degreesC and pH 7.0 after 5 d under argon in the dark. The [Ru(bipy)(terpy)(cyt c)]-product was characterized by UV/Vis, emission and mass spectrometry. The location where the [Ru(bipy)(terpy)] complex was coupled to the protein was identified as His44 (corresponding to His39 in other numbering schemes) using digestion of the Ru-coupled protein by trypsin and analysis of the tryptic peptides by HPLC-high resolution MS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available