4.5 Article

Influence of phosphorus and potassium on alfalfa yield and yield components

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 297-304

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0297

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphorus and K fertilization increases alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) yield and stand persistence, but the changes in yield components as affected by P and K fertility level are not known. Our hypothesis is that P and (or) K fertilization will increase one or more alfalfa yield components, and those component responses may change with stand age. The objectives of this field study were to determine the impact of P and K fertilization on alfalfa forage yield and yield components during the initial 3 yr after establishment. Treatments were the factorial combinations of four P rates (0, 25, 50, and 75 kg P ha(-1)) and five K rates (0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 kg K ha(-1)) arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Forage harvests occurred four times annually, and yield, mass shoot(-1), and shoots area(-1) were determined. Plant populations were determined in early December and late May each year. Incremental additions of P and K increased alfalfa yield in each year. Potassium fertilization did not influence plant population, while robust P-responsive alfalfa plants apparently crowded out smaller, less vigorous plants thus decreasing plants m(-2). Stand assessments based on shoot counts, or aboveground plant counts may not accurately indicate alfalfa yield potential. Shoots plant(-1) was not affected by application of either nutrient, while shoots m(-2) generally declined with increased P and K fertilization. Improved forage yield of P- and K-fertilized plots was consistently associated with greater mass shoot(-1). Because fertilizer-responsiveness is closely associated with greater mass shoot(-1), cultivars possessing this trait may be relatively more productive under well-fertilized conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available