4.8 Article

Definition of PKC-α, CDK6, and MET as Therapeutic Targets in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 74, Issue 17, Pages 4822-4835

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0584

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [CA10931 I, A099031, CCSG CA16672]
  2. National Breast Cancer Foundation, Inc.
  3. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  4. The University of Texas MD Anderson-China Medical University
  5. Hospital Sister Institution Fund
  6. Ministry of Health and Welfare, China.Medical University Hospital Cancer Research Center of Excellence, Taiwan [MOHW103-TD-B-111-03]
  7. Program for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Frontier Research, Taiwan [NSC 102-2321-B-039-001]
  8. International Research-Intensive Centers of Excellent T in Taiwan [NSC 103-2911-1-002-303]
  9. National Science Council of Taiwan [101IP999900059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous and recurrent subtype of breast cancer that lacks an effective targeted therapy. To identify candidate therapeutic targets, we profiled global gene expression in TNBC and breast tumor-initiating cells with a patient survival dataset. Eight TNBC-related kinases were found to be overexpressed in TNBC cells with stem-like properties. Among them, expression of PKC-alpha. MET, and CHK6 correlated with poorer survival outcomes. In cases coexpressing two of these three kinases, survival rates were lower than in cases where only one of these kinases was expressed. In functional tests, two-drug combinations targeting these three kinases inhibited TNBC cell proliferation and turnorigenic potential in a cooperative manner. A combination of PKC-alpha-MET inhibitors also attenuated tumor growth in a cooperative manner in vivo. Our findings define three kinases critical for TNBC growth and offer a preclinical rationale for their candidacy as effective therapeutic targets in treating TNBC. (C)2014 AACR

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available