4.7 Article

Membrane gas permeance in gas-liquid membrane contactor systems for solutions containing a highly reactive absorbent

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 246, Issue 1, Pages 27-37

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.06.042

Keywords

mass transfer; microporous membrane; PTMSP; gas-liquid membrane contactor; absorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In gas-liquid membrane contacting, it is important to know the gas permeance of microporous hydrophobic membranes used in such a system. Gas permeance of carbon dioxide from a CO2-N-2 mixture having a low CO2 concentration into an aqueous KOH solution through flat microporous (Celgard 2400, Saint-Gobain R128-10)/nonporous poly(1-trimethysilyl-1-propyne) (PTMSP) membranes is therefore studied at zero net total pressure difference (DeltaP = 0). Pure gas permeance data of CO, through the same membranes for positive DeltaP and gas-gas system are extrapolated to zero mean pressure (P = 0) to find also gas permeance. Conventional theoretical estimates of the liquid film resistance for such systems are compared with the experimental results for the liquid film resistance; they were found to be considerably higher than that estimated from the theory based on a liquid film having a fast chemical reaction. The membrane resistance obtained by subtraction of the experimental liquid film resistance from the total resistance of the system appears to predict the CO2 permeance for the thicker PTMSP film measured under positive DeltaP quite well. However, this method leads to higher estimates of membrane resistance for thinner PTMSP films, Celgard 2400 and other supposedly highly permeable porous substrates compared to those based on the data obtained by extrapolation to P = 0. There appears to be an upper limit of permeance which may be determined correctly in such experimental measurements based on DeltaP = 0. This upper limit is considerably higher than what has been achieved by earlier investigators. Several factors potentially contributing to this discrepancy have been pointed out. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available