4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Carbon isotope analysis of bulk keratin and single amino acids from British and North American hair

Journal

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages 3227-3231

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.2150

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reconstruction of ancient diets using isotopic measurements of bone collagen, and other tissues, which survive in archaeological contexts, relies on known isotopic relationships between diet and body tissues. Examination of these relationships often requires the study of modern human and animal subjects. While hair keratin can act as a useful proxy for bone collagen in isotopic studies on living humans, where it is inappropriate to sample tissues such as collagen, it can, in addition, act as a chronological indicator of dietary change. This study investigates hair keratin delta C-13 values from current residents of the UK and the USA. Residents in the USA showed a clear bulk hair delta C-13 enrichment of approximately 3 parts per thousand over UK individuals, attributed to an elevated C-4 dietary input from maize fed to livestock in North America. The keratin delta C-13 of subjects who moved between the UK and USA showed a pronounced change after relocation, taking approximately 4 months to reach isotopic equilibrium. To investigate these differences further, we measured delta C-13 values of dispensable and indispensable amino acids as a group, and selected individual amino acids. As a group, enrichment of dispensable amino acids compared with indispensable amino acids occurred in samples from both continents, averaging 7.2 parts per thousand in the UK and 7.9 parts per thousand in the USA. Dispensable and indispensable amino acids, as well as all individual amino acids measured, were enriched in samples from the USA compared with those from the UK. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available