4.8 Article

The Cyclic AMP Pathway Is a Sex-Specific Modifier of Glioma Risk in Type I Neurofibromatosis Patients

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 16-21

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1891

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Children's Discovery Institute of Washington University
  2. NCI [RO1-CA136573, UO1-CA141549]
  3. NIH [UL1RR025764]
  4. DOD [W81XWH-11-1-0250]
  5. Children's Tumor Foundation
  6. Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute
  7. University of Utah
  8. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics of the National Cancer Institute
  9. NCI Cancer Center [P30 CA91842]
  10. ICTS/CTSA from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the NIH [UL1TR000448]
  11. NIH, NCI [IRP ZIA BC 010539]
  12. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Identifying modifiers of glioma risk in patients with type I neurofibromatosis (NF1) could help support personalized tumor surveillance, advance understanding of gliomagenesis, and potentially identify novel therapeutic targets. Here, we report genetic polymorphisms in the human adenylate cyclase gene adenylate cyclase 8 (ADCY8) that correlate with glioma risk in NF1 in a sex-specific manner, elevating risk in females while reducing risk in males. This finding extends earlier evidence of a role for cAMP in gliomagenesis based on results in a genetically engineered mouse model (Nf1 GEM). Thus, sexually dimorphic cAMP signaling might render males and females differentially sensitive to variation in cAMP levels. Using male and female Nf1 GEM, we found significant sex differences exist in cAMP regulation and in the growth-promoting effects of cAMP suppression. Overall, our results establish a sex-specific role for cAMP regulation in human gliomagenesis, specifically identifying ADCY8 as a modifier of glioma risk in NF1. (C)2014 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available