4.8 Article

Biallelic DICER1 Mutations in Sporadic Pleuropulmonary Blastoma

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 74, Issue 10, Pages 2742-2749

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2470

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research on Measures for Intractable Diseases, Health, and Labor Sciences Research Grants
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  3. Research on Health Sciences focusing on Drug Innovation
  4. Japan Health Sciences Foundation
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, KAKENHI [22134006]
  6. Project for the Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics (P-DIRECT)
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through the Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program),
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25730173, 23390269] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) is a rare pediatric malignancy whose pathogens are poorly understood. Recent reports suggest that germline mutations in the microRNA-processing enzyme DICER1 may contribute to PPB development. To investigate the genetic basis of this cancer, we performed whole-exome sequencing or targeted deep sequencing of multiple cases of PPB. We found biallelic DICER1 mutations to be very common, more common than TP53 mutations also found in many tumors. Somatic ribonuclease III (RNase IIIb) domain mutations were identified in all evaluable cases, either in the presence or absence of nonsense/frameshift mutations. Most cases had mutated DICER1 alleles in the germline with or without an additional somatic mutation in the remaining allele, whereas other cases displayed somatic mutations exclusively where the RNase IIIb domain was invariably affected. Our results highlight the role of RNase IIIb domain mutations in DICER1 along with TP53 inactivation in PPB pathogenesis. (C)2014 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available