4.8 Article

Distinct organ-specific metastatic potential of individual breast cancer cells and primary tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 44-55

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI200522320

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01-CA94060, P01 CA094060, P30 CA008748] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM07739, T32 GM007739] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA094060, P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM007739] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used bioluminescence imaging to reveal patterns of metastasis formation by human breast cancer cells in immunodeficient mice. Individual cells from a population established in culture from the pleural effusion of a breast cancer patient showed distinct patterns of organ-specific metastasis. Single-cell progenies derived from this population exhibited markedly different abilities to metastasize to the bone, lung, or adrenal medulla. which suggests that metastases to different organs have different requirements. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that these different single-cell progenies similarly express a previously described poor-prognosis gene expression signature. Unsupervised classification using the transcriptomic data set supported the hypothesis that organ-specific metastasis by breast cancer cells is controlled by metastasis-specific genes that are separate from a general poor-prognosis gene expression signature. Furthermore, by using a gene expression signature associated with the ability of these cells to metastasize to bone, we were able to distinguish primary breast carcinomas that preferentially metastasized to bone from those that preferentially metastasized elsewhere. These results suggest that the bone-specific metastatic phenotypes and gene expression signature identified in a mouse model may be clinically relevant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available