4.7 Article

Quantification of axial alignment of the lower extremity on conventional and digital total leg radiographs

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 170-173

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2436-8

Keywords

digital radiography; lower limb alignment; computer-assisted angle measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose was to assess axial alignment of the lower limb using mechanical axis measurements on conventional and digital radiographs. Total-leg radiographs of 24 patients, 8 male and 16 female, with a mean age of 68.6 +/- 10.2 years, were performed in a standardized anteriorposterior projection and standing position using a conventional and digital phosphor storage film screen radiography system. Knee joint angulation was assessed by measuring the angle between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the middle of the femoral condyles and a line drawn from the middle of the tibial condyles to the midpoint of the malleolus. On conventional leg radiographs, line drawing and angle measurement were performed manually with a transparent goniometer. Angle measurement on digital leg radiographs was performed on a PACS workstation using computer-assisted measurement software (IMPAX, AGFA-GEVAERT, Belgium). Evaluation time for both measurements was recorded. We diagnosed 14 varus and 10 valgus angulations of the knee joint. The mean individual difference between axis deviation of conventional digital leg radiographs was 0.93 +/- 0.6degrees(min 0degrees, max 2degrees), the mean difference in varus angulation was 1.13 +/- 0.45degrees (min 0.3degrees, max 2degrees), and the mean difference in valgus angulation was 0.65 +/- 0.71degrees (min 0degrees, max 2degrees). Angle measurements on conventional and digital radiographs did not show any statistically significant difference. Mean time exposure was 4.9 min/patient for manual and 1.08 min/patient for computer-assisted angle measurement (P<0.001). Computer-assisted angle measurement on digital total-leg radiographs represents a reliable method with no significant angle differences compared to conventional radiographic systems and offers a significantly lower evaluation time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available