4.6 Article

Sourcing faecal pollution from onsite wastewater treatment systems in surface waters using antibiotic resistance analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 3, Pages 471-482

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02644.x

Keywords

antibiotic resistance; discriminant analysis; Escherichia coli; onsite systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To identify the sources of faecal contamination in investigated surface waters and to determine the significance of onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) as a major contributor to faecal contamination. Methods and Results: Antibiotic resistance patterns (AR-P) were established for a library of 717 known Escherichia colt source isolates obtained from human, domesticated animals, livestock and wild sources. Eight commonly used antibiotics, including amoxicillin, cephalothin, erythromycin, gentamicin, ofloxacin, chlortetracycline, tetracycline and moxalactam, at four different concentrations were used to obtain ARPs for E. colt isolates. Discriminant analysis (DA) was used to differentiate between the ARP of sources isolates. The developed ARP library was found to be adequate for discriminating human from nonhuman isolates, and was used to classify 256 enumerated E. colt isolates collected from monitored surface water locations. Conclusions: The resulting ARP DA indicated that a majority of the faecal contamination in more rural areas was nonhuman; however, the percentage of human isolates increased significantly in urbanized areas using OWTS for wastewater treatment. Significance and Impact of the Study: This study signifies the feasibility of using ARP for source tracking faecal contamination in surface waters, and linking faecal contamination to OWTS. The information will enable regulatory authorities to implement appropriate management practices to reduce the contamination of water resources caused by high densities and failing OWTS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available