Journal
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 94-104Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02611.x
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis; Escherichia coli O157 : H7; Listeria monocytogenes; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; pulsed electric fields; Salmonella; sublethal injury; Yersinia enterocolitica
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Aims: The objective was to investigate the occurrence of sublethal injury after pulsed electric field ( PEF) depending on the treatment time, the electric field strength and the pH of the treatment media in two Gram- positive ( Bacillus subtilis ssp. niger, Listeria monocytogenes) and six Gram- negative ( Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli O157: H7, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella serotype Senftenberg 775W, Salmonella serotype Typhimurium, Yersinia enterocolitica) bacterial strains. Methods and Results: A characteristic behaviour was observed for the Gram- positive and Gram- negative bacteria studied. Whereas Gram- positive bacteria showed a higher PEF resistance at pH 70, the Gram- negative were more resistant at pH 4.0. In these conditions, in which bacteria showed their maximum resistance, a large proportion of sublethally injured cells were detected. In most cases, the longer the treatment time and the higher the electric field applied, the greater the proportion of sublethally injured cells that were detected. No sublethal injury was detected when Gram- positive bacteria were treated at pH 4.0 and Gram- negative at pH 70. Conclusions: Sublethal injury was detected after PEF so, bacterial inactivation by PEF is not an 'all or nothing' event. Significance and Impact of the Study: This work could be useful for improving food preservation by PEF.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available