4.5 Article

Anticancer properties of propofol-docosahexaenoate and propofol-eicosapentaenoate on breast cancer cells

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages R645-R654

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1036

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Epidemiological evidence strongly links fish oil, which is rich in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), with low incidences of several types of cancer. The inhibitory effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on cancer development and progression are supported by studies with cultured cells and animal models. Propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is the most extensively used general anesthetic - sedative agent employed today and is nontoxic to humans at high levels ( 50 mu g/ml). Clinically relevant concentrations of propofol ( 3 to 8 mu g/ml; 20 to 50 mu M) have also been reported to have anticancer activities. The present study describes the synthesis, purification, characterization and evaluation of two novel anticancer conjugates, propofol-docosahexaenoate (propofol-DHA) and propofol-eicosapentaenoate (propofol-EPA). Methods The conjugates linking an omega-3 fatty acid, either DHA or EPA, with propofol were synthesized and tested for their effects on migration, adhesion and apoptosis on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Results At low concentrations ( 25 mu M), DHA, EPA or propofol alone or in combination had minimal effect on cell adhesion to vitronectin, cell migration against serum and the induction of apoptosis ( only 5 to 15% of the cells became apoptotic). In contrast, the propofol-DHA or propofol-EPA conjugates significantly inhibited cell adhesion ( 15 to 30%) and migration ( about 50%) and induced apoptosis ( about 40%) in breast cancer cells. Conclusion These results suggest that the novel propofol-DHA and propofol-EPA conjugates reported here may be useful for the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available