4.6 Article

Transcription-based prediction of response to IFN beta using supervised computational methods

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 166-176

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI042911] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [1R01 AI42911] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in cellular functions in response to drug therapy are mediated by specific transcriptional profiles resulting from the induction or repression in the activity of a number of genes, thereby modifying the preexisting gene activity pattern of the drug- targeted cell( s). Recombinant human interferon beta ( rIFNbeta) is routinely used to control exacerbations in multiple sclerosis patients with only partial success, mainly because of adverse effects and a relatively large proportion of nonresponders. We applied advanced data- mining and predictive modeling tools to a longitudinal 70- gene expression dataset generated by kinetic reverse- transcription PCR from 52 multiple sclerosis patients treated with rIFNbeta to discover higher- order predictive patterns associated with treatment outcome and to define the molecular footprint that rIFNbeta engraves on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We identified nine sets of gene triplets whose expression, when tested before the initiation of therapy, can predict the response to interferon beta with up to 86% accuracy. In addition, time- series analysis revealed potential key players involved in a good or poor response to interferon beta. Statistical testing of a random outcome class and tolerance to noise was carried out to establish the robustness of the predictive models. Large- scale kinetic reverse- transcription PCR, coupled with advanced data- mining efforts, can effectively reveal preexisting and drug- induced gene expression signatures associated with therapeutic effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available