4.6 Article

Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments - Results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 119-122

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.007

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe the rise of treatment for tobacco dependence in relation to insurance Status and advice from a healthcare provider in a population-based national sample interviewed in 2000. Methods: Analyses are based on 3996 adult smokers who participated in the National Health Interview Survey in 2000, and who provided information on tobacco-cessation treatments used at their most recent quit attempt occurring in the last year. Age-adjuSted and weighted categorical analysis was Used to compute prevalence estimates of self-reported treatments (pharmacotherapy and behavioral counseling) for tobacco dependence. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with use of treatments. Results: Overall, 22.4% of smokers who tried to quit in the prexious year used one or more t%-peS of cessation aid compared to 15% in 1986. Treatment usually involved pharmacotherapy (21.7%) rather than behavioral counseling (1.3%). Smokers attempting to quit were more likely to use cessation aids if covered by private (25.4%) or military (25.0%) insurance dian by Medicare (17.8%), Medicaid (15.5%), or no insurance (13.2%). In a multivariate analysis of factors related to use of cessation aids, advice from a healthcare provider to quit smoking and the number of cigarettes smoked per day were significant predictors of treatment use, regardless of insurance status. Conclusions: Cessation aids are under-used across insurance categories. Advice by a healthcare provider to quit is associated with increased use of effective therapies for tobacco dependence. Systematic efforts are needed to eliminate barriers to appropriate treatment. (C) 2005 American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available