4.3 Article

Relationship between self-reported periodontal status and skeletal bone mineral density in Japanese postmenopausal women

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00042192-200512020-00007

Keywords

periodontal; menopause; self-report; bone mineral density; spine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Several investigators have linked periodontal disease progression and low skeletal bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. However, little is known about whether self-reported periodontal status is the reflection of skeletal bone mineral density. We investigated whether self-reported poor periodontal status is associated with low skeletal bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Design: Relationships among self-reported periodontal status, number of teeth remaining, and bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck were evaluated in 253 Japanese postmenopausal women (mean +/- SD, 56.6 +/- 7.7) recruited from the patients who visited our clinic for bone mineral assessment between 1997 and 2003. Self-reported periodontal symptoms included gingival swelling, gingival bleeding, purulent discharge, and tooth mobility at the time of bone mineral assessment. Results: Analysis of covariance adjusted for age, height, weight, years since menopause, duration of estrogen use, and regular oral care revealed that subjects without periodontal symptoms had significantly higher BMD of the lumbar spine than did those with periodontal symptoms (mean +/- SEM, 0.962 +/- 0.014 vs 0.921 +/- 0.013; P = 0.038); however, there were no significant differences in the number of remaining teeth and bone mineral density of the femoral neck between them. The odds of low spine bone mineral density in subjects with periodontal symptoms was 2.01 (95% CI = 1.15 to 3.50). Conclusion: Our results suggest that self-reported poor periodontal status may be associated with low bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available