4.7 Article

Parallel methods for optimality criteria-based topology optimization

Journal

COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING
Volume 194, Issue 34-35, Pages 3637-3667

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.08.008

Keywords

topology optimization; parallel computing; preconditioners

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Topology optimization problems require the repeated solution of finite element problems that are often extremely ill-conditioned due to highly heterogeneous material distributions. This makes the use of iterative linear solvers inefficient unless appropriate preconditioning is used. Even then, the solution time for topology optimization problems is typically very high. These problems are addressed by considering the use of non-overlapping domain decomposition based parallel methods for the solution of topology optimization problems. The parallel algorithms presented here are based on the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) formulation of the topology optimization problem and use the optimality criteria method for iterative optimization. We consider three parallel linear solvers to solve the equilibrium problem at each step of the iterative optimization procedure. These include two preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) methods: one using a diagonal preconditioner and one using an incomplete LU factorization preconditioner with a drop tolerance. A third substructuring solver that employs a hybrid of direct and iterative (PCG) techniques is also studied. This solver is found to be the most effective of the three solvers studied, both in terms of parallel efficiency and in terms of its ability to mitigate the effects of ill-conditioning. In addition to examining parallel linear solvers, we consider the parallelization of the iterative optimality criteria method. To tackle checkerboarding and mesh dependence, we propose a multi-pass filtering technique that limits the number of ghost elements that need to be exchanged across interprocessor boundaries. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available