4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

LC enantioseparation of beta-lactam and beta-amino acid stereoisomers and a comparison of macrocyclic glycopepticle- and beta-cyclodextrin-based columns

Journal

CHROMATOGRAPHIA
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages S37-S43

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-005-0701-x

Keywords

column liquid chromatography; chirobiotic T and TAG columns; cyclobond DMP column; beta-amino acids; beta-lactams

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic methods were developed for the separation of the enantiomers of tricyclic beta-lactams, cis-3,4-benzo-6-azabi cyclo[3.2.0]heptan-7-one, cis-4,5-benzo-7-azabicyclo[4.2.0] -octan-8-one, cis-5,6-benzo-8-azabicyclo[5.2.0]nonan-9-one and new bicyclic beta-amino acids, the six- and seven-membered komologues of cis-1-amino-4,5-benzocyclopentane-2-carboxylic acid (benzocispentocin), cis-1-amino-5,6-benzocyclohexane-2-carboxylic acid and cis-1-amino-6,7-benzocycloheptane-2-carboxylic acid. The direct separations of the analytes were performed on chiral stationary phase (CSP) columns containing the macrocyclic glycopeptide antibiotic teicoplanin (Chirobiotic T), teicoplanin aglycone (Chirobiotic TAG), vancomycin (Chirobiotic V), vancomycin aglycone (Chirobiotic VAG), ristocetin A (Chirobiotic R) or a new dimethylphenyl carbamate-derivatized beta-cyclodextrin-based Cyclobond DMP. The results achieved with the different methods were compared in systematic chromatographic examinations. The effects of an organic modifier and of the mobile phase composition on the separation and the separation efficiency of different columns were investigated. The difference in enantioselective free energy between the aglycone CSP and the teicoplanin CSP for these beta-lactams and beta-amino acids ranged between 0.3 and -1.1 kJ mol(-1). Better enantioseparations were attained in most cases on the aglycone CSP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available