4.3 Review

Monitoring nutrition in small ruminants with the aid of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) technology: A review

Journal

SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.12.012

Keywords

goat; sheep; deer; feed spectra; fecal spectra

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review aims to evaluate the contribution of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to monitor nutrition in small ruminants, with particular emphasis on the use of feed spectra and fecal spectra. NIRS provides satisfactory accuracy in the analysis of the chemical constituents of feeds for small ruminants, e.g., crude protein and cell wall composition, and is sometimes better than in vitro procedures for predicting in vivo digestibility and the available energy in feeds. In addition, in vitro digestibility can be accurately estimated by NIRS. The effective rumen degradability of protein could potentially be accurately predicted by NIRS, which would eliminate the need for rumen-fistulated animals. Good accuracy in the prediction of tannins has been reported for narrow, single-species applications, as well as for broad arrays of browse species. The identification of NIR segments corresponding to undigested entities has potential to help in providing spectral markers of digestibility. Fecal output can easily be evaluated, using the NIRS-aided analysis of polyethylene glycol (PEG) administered as external indigestible marker. Analysis of NIR spectra of the feces enables the accurate prediction of the chemical characteristics of the feed (dry matter digestibility and crude protein, cell wall attributes, PEG-binding tannins) in stall-fed and grazing animals, and to some extent, of the botanical composition of diets at pasture. Thus, fecal NIRS methodology holds the potential to provide nutritional diagnoses for farmers raising small ruminant. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available