4.6 Article

Functional analysis of Nox4 reveals unique characteristics compared to other NADPH oxidases

Journal

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 69-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.03.023

Keywords

NADPH oxidase; Nox4; reactive oxygen species; regulation; epithelial cells; Rac GTPase; p22(phox)

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA084138] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL045635] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P01GM037696] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCI NIH HHS [CA84138] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-45635] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM37696] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important signal transduction molecules in ligand-induced signaling, regulation of cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis and motility. Recently NADPH oxidases (Nox) homologous to Nox2 (gp91(phox)) of phagocyte cytochrome b(558) have been identified, which are an enzymatic source for ROS generation in epithelial cells. This study was undertaken to delineate the requirements for ROS generation by Nox4. Nox4, in contrast to other Nox proteins, produces large amounts of hydrogen peroxide constitutively. Known cytosolic oxidase proteins or the GTPase Rac are not required for this activity. Nox4 associates with the protein p22(phox) on internal membranes, where ROS generation occurs. Knockdown and gene transfection studies confirmed that Nox4 requires p22(phox) for ROS generation. Mutational analysis revealed structural requirements affecting expression of the p22(phox) protein and Nox activity. Mechanistic insight into ROS regulation is significant for understanding fundamental cell biology and pathophysiological conditions. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available