4.6 Review

Inhibition of fatty acid synthase by polyphenols

Journal

CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 967-977

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/092986706776361012

Keywords

fatty acid synthase; inhibition; polyphenols; catechins; theaflavins; flavonoids; obesity; cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, animal fatty acid synthase (FAS) is reported as a potential therapeutic target for obesity and cancer. Considerable interest has been developed in identifying novel inhibitors of the enzyme. It is found that tea polyphenols inhibit FAS in both reversible and irreversible manners. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and epicatechin gallate (ECG) inhibit FAS with IC50 values of 52 mu M and 42 mu M mainly by reacting on the beta-ketoacyl reductase (KR) domain of FAS. The inhibitory ability of catechin gallate (CG) is 15 and 12 folds higher than that of EGCG and ECG. Its major reacting site on FAS is not KR. All of these irreversibly inactivate FAS on the KR domain with similar rates. Mulliken population analysis suggests that the positive charge is distributed on the carbon atom of galloyl ester, and this carbon becomes more susceptible for a nucleophilic attack. 12 flavonoids inhibit FAS with IC50 values ranging from 2 to 112 mu M. SAR analysis shows that the flavonoids containing two hydroxyl groups in B ring and 5, 7-hydroxyl groups in A ring with C-2, 3 double bond are the most potent inhibitors. The inhibition kinetics shows that they inhibit FAS competitively with acetyl CoA and most likely react mainly on acyl transferase domain. Further studies show that C ring of flavonoids is not necessary for the inhibition. Resveratrol, phlorizin and NDGA contain two phenyl rings connected by 2 to 4 atom chains instead of C ring. Their IC50 values range from 5 mu M to 40 mu M. From these results, it common model for polyphenol inhibitor of FAS is conceived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available