4.8 Article

Silencing of the miR-17∼92 Cluster Family Inhibits Medulloblastoma Progression

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 73, Issue 23, Pages 7068-7078

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0927

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [CA-096832, CA02165-29]
  2. Children's Brain Tumor Foundation Award
  3. George J. Mitchell Endowed Fellowship
  4. American Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC) of St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medulloblastoma, originating in the cerebellum, is the most common malignant brain tumor in children. Medulloblastoma consists of four major groups where constitutive activation of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway is a hallmark of one group. Mouse and human SHH medulloblastomas exhibit increased expression of microRNAs encoded by the miR-17 similar to 92 and miR-106b similar to 25 clusters compared with granule progenitors and postmitotic granule neurons. Here, we assessed the therapeutic potential of 8-mer seed-targeting locked nucleic acid (LNA)-modified anti-miR oligonucleotides, termed tiny LNAs, that inhibit microRNA seed families expressed by miR-17 similar to 92 and miR-106b similar to 25 in two mouse models of SHH medulloblastomas. We found that tumor cells (medulloblastoma cells) passively took up 8-mer LNA-anti-miRs and specifically inhibited targeted microRNA seed-sharing family members. Inhibition of miR-17 and miR-19a seed families by anti-miR-17 and anti-miR-19, respectively, resulted in diminished tumor cell proliferation in vitro. Treatment of mice with systemic delivery of anti-miR-17 and anti-miR-19 reduced tumor growth in flank and brain allografts in vivo and prolonged the survival of mice with intracranial transplants, suggesting that inhibition of the miR-17 similar to 92 cluster family by 8-mer LNA-anti-miRs might be considered for the treatment of SHH medulloblastomas. (C)2013 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available