4.8 Article

Cisplatin Resistance Associated with PARP Hyperactivation

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 73, Issue 7, Pages 2271-2280

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3000

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission (ArtForce)
  2. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR)
  3. Ligue contre le Cancer (Equipe labellisee)
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM)
  5. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  6. LabEx Immuno-Oncologie
  7. Fondation de France
  8. Fondation Bettencourt-Schueller
  9. AXA Chair for Longevity Research
  10. Canceropole Ile-de-France and Paris Alliance of Cancer Research Institutes (PACRI)
  11. French Ministry of Science
  12. FRM
  13. Groupe Pasteur Mutualite
  14. Action Lions Vaincre le Cancer (Luxembourg)
  15. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  16. Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-small cell lung carcinoma patients are frequently treated with cisplatin (CDDP), most often yielding temporary clinical responses. Here, we show that PARP1 is highly expressed and constitutively hyperactivated in a majority of human CDDP-resistant cancer cells of distinct histologic origin. Cells manifesting elevated intracellular levels of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated proteins (PAR(high)) responded to pharmacologic PARP inhibitors as well as to PARP1-targeting siRNAs by initiating a DNA damage response that translated into cell death following the activation of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. Moreover, PARP1-overexpressing tumor cells and xenografts displayed elevated levels of PAR, which predicted the response to PARP inhibitors in vitro and in vivo more accurately than PARP1 expression itself. Thus, a majority of CDDP-resistant cancer cells appear to develop a dependency to PARP1, becoming susceptible to PARP inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res; 73(7); 2271-80. (C)2013 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available