4.1 Article

Reduced-intensity conditioning followed by unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies: Rapid engraftment in bone marrow

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages 74-79

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1532/IJH97.05124

Keywords

hematologic malignancy; cord blood transplantation; adult; reduced-intensity conditioning

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reduced-intensity (RI) conditioning followed by cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a new treatment modality, but failure to engraft is a major concern. We describe 12 patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who underwent RI conditioning and CBT with a conditioning regimen consisting of 200 mg/m(2) fludarabine (Flu), 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide (CY), and 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI). Cyclosporin A and/or methotrexate were used for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Cord blood grafts were not mismatched for more than 2 serologically defined HLA alleles but were later found by high-resolution DNA typing to be mismatched for 2 to 4 alleles in most cases. Short tandem repeat analysis of bone marrow cells at day 14 showed complete donor chimerism in 6 of the patients and mixed chimerism in 5, indicating rapid engraftment in the bone marrow, whereas the remaining patient experienced graft rejection. Neutrophil recovery was achieved at a median of day 17 (range, days 11-24) in 10 of the 11 patients with marrow chimerism at day 14. Of these 10 patients, however, transplantation-related mortality within 100 days occurred in 4 patients who showed failed platelet recovery and a lack of durable engraftment. Overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 41.7% and 33.3%, respectively. These results show that CB mismatched at 2 to 4 HLA alleles and transplanted with the Flu/CY/3 Gy TBI regimen is able to engraft in the bone marrow as early as day 14.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available