4.8 Article

The Role of Cell Density and Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Multidrug Resistance

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 73, Issue 24, Pages 7168-7175

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1768

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute
  2. UMD-NCI Partnership for Cancer Technology
  3. NSF/NIGMS program [DMS-0758374]
  4. National Cancer Institute [R01CA130817]
  5. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0758374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent data have demonstrated that cancer drug resistance reflects complex biologic factors, including tumor heterogeneity, varying growth, differentiation, apoptosis pathways, and cell density. As a result, there is a need to find new ways to incorporate these complexities in the mathematical modeling of multidrug resistance. Here, we derive a novel structured population model that describes the behavior of cancer cells under selection with cytotoxic drugs. Our model is designed to estimate intratumoral heterogeneity as a function of the resistance level and time. This updated model of the multidrug resistance problem integrates both genetic and epigenetic changes, density dependence, and intratumoral heterogeneity. Our results suggest that treatment acts as a selection process, whereas genetic/epigenetic alteration rates act as a diffusion process. Application of our model to cancer treatment suggests that reducing alteration rates as a first step in treatment causes a reduction in tumor heterogeneity and may improve targeted therapy. The new insight provided by this model could help to dramatically change the ability of clinical oncologists to design new treatment protocols and analyze the response of patients to therapy. (C) 2013 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available