4.6 Article

Needle enzyme electrode based glucose diffusive transport measurement in a collagen gel and validation of a simulation model

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 131, Issue 7, Pages 816-821

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b600334f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [E18399] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid response needle enzyme electrodes were fabricated to measure the glucose concentration at the centre of a cylindrical spiralled collagen gel, which is a relevant constituent for tissue engineering scaffolds. The experimental data were based on a low consumption glucose sensor which minimised the distorting effect of enzymatic degradation. As the measurement was carried out within a collagen gel the stirring independence was compulsory for the biosensor. Glucose concentration changes were derived from a model based on the solution to Fick's Second Law. This had two different expressions for different dimensionless time (T) domains. The expression for large T and a first order approximation for small T were known. The expression for high order approximation for small T was then derived. An analytical expression consisting of fast convergent parts of these two expressions is proposed, which operates for the entire time region. A computational model for glucose concentration evolution where an electrode is located is proposed to operate for extended time periods. The model was confirmed by agreement between the simulated and observed data. An experimental technique is developed here to determine glucose diffusion coefficient by fitting the simulated concentration profile to the observed one. The glucose diffusion coefficient within the collagen gel was estimated to be 1.3 x 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1); higher accuracy is achieved here because errors due to noise, baseline and zero time determination are minimised with best fit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available