4.5 Article

3-D deformation pattern analysis and evolution of the Anisclo anticline, southern Pyrenees

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 695-712

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.01.009

Keywords

thrust-related folding; brittle deformation analysis; layer-parallel shortening; cross-section balancing; Pyrenees

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the genetic relationships of folding-related deformation structures is of importance for both academic and industrial purposes. We analysed the three-dimensional deformation pattern of the Anisclo anticline, in the southern Pyrenees. The specifically designed statistical method includes sequential steps of statistical and spatial data analysis and classification. Our results indicate that pressure solution cleavage frequency exhibits a spatial distribution that depends on the position within the fold. Conversely, such a dependence does not occur in joints and veins. Consequently, our data suggest that pressure-solution cleavage is the most appropriate deformation structure for unravelling fault-fold kinematics in carbonate multilayer. In particular, we found that the spacing of solution cleavages (S) is related to the corresponding bed thickness (H). This supports the use of HIS value for deformation intensity quantification instead of spacing. In the Anisclo anticline, analysis of HIS indicates the occurrence of three main deformation panels whose restoration suggests that fold evolution progressed from layer-parallel shortening, to decollement folding, up to thrust breakthrough, and fault-propagation folding. Comparison of HIS values with finite strain data indicates that line-length was not preserved during fold evolution. This evidence has important implications for the kinematic interpretation of layer-parallel shortening and cross-section balancing. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available