4.8 Review

Recent trends on nanocomposites based on Cu, Ag and Au clusters: A closer look

Journal

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
Volume 250, Issue 11-12, Pages 1294-1314

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.12.003

Keywords

metal nanoparticles; nanocomposites; preparation techniques; sol-gel; RF-sputtering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocomposite materials based on metal nanoparticles (NPs, guest) in/on oxide matrices (host) have attracted increasing attention thanks to their intriguing chemico-physical properties that can be tailored as a function of NP size, shape and mutual interactions. The possibility to obtain a controlled dispersion of metal particles in/on suitable oxides (inside- and outside-cluster systems, respectively) paves the way to a broad spectrum of technological applications, ranging from heterogeneous catalysis, to gas sensing and non-linear optics. The control of functional performances relies on tailoring the system properties by design through a suitable choice of the synthesis and processing routes. In this context, the present review provides a synoptic overview on our recent research activity concerning nanocomposites containing 11th group metal clusters (Cu, Ag and Au), dispersed in/on oxide matrices (SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3). We begin by briefly outlining the interest and size-dependent properties of such systems. Subsequently, the attention is switched to a survey on the preparation strategies previously adopted in the literature, focusing in particular on the use of soft methods, such as sol-gel (SG), RF-sputtering and their innovative combination. The most relevant results on M'/MxOy nanocomposites (where M' = Cu, Ag, An and M = Si, Ti, Al) obtained by these routes are then comparatively discussed, highlighting analogies and differences between them. Finally, the most attractive research perspectives in the field are briefly presented. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available