4.5 Article

The prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders in adolescents with a history of specific language impairment (SLI)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 621-628

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01584.x

Keywords

specific language impairment (SLI); autism; prevalence; diagnosis

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-27-0003] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Wellcome Trust [060774] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Traditionally, autism and specific language impairment (SLI) have been regarded as distinct disorders but, more recently, evidence has been put forward for a closer link between them: a common set of language problems, in particular receptive language difficulties and the existence of intermediate cases including pragmatic language impairment. The present study aimed to examine the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in a large sample of adolescents with a history of SLI. Method: The presence of autism spectrum disorders was examined in seventy-six 14-year-olds with a confirmed history of SLI. A variety of instruments were employed, including the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) and the Family History Interview (FHI). Results: The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders in young people with SLI was found to be 3.9%, about 10 times what would be expected from the general population. In addition, a much larger number of young people with a history of SLI showed only some autism spectrum symptoms or showed them in a mild form. Conclusions: Young people with SLI have an increased risk of autism. The magnitude of this risk is considerable. In addition, a larger proportion ( a quarter of individuals) present with a number of behaviours consistent with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available