4.1 Article

Obstructive primary bladder neck disease: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of alpha(1)-blockers

Journal

UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS
Volume 76, Issue 2, Pages 150-153

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000090879

Keywords

primary bladder neck obstruction; urodynamics; alpha(1)-adrenergic blockers; endoscopic incision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The efficacy and safety of using alpha(1)-adrenergic blockers for treating primary bladder neck obstruction in young and middle-aged men was assessed as the first therapeutic step, before surgery, in a symptomatic nonneurogenic selected group of patients. Materials and Methods: From January 1995 to December 2001, primary bladder neck obstruction was diagnosed in 41 men whose average age was 43 years. All of them were evaluated by a complete clinical history, American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score index, physical examination, uroflowmetry, transabdominal ultrasound prostatic volume determination, ultrasound post-void residual determination, videourodynamics including pressure-flow analysis and upper urinary tract screening with renal ultrasound or an excretory urogram. A full daily dose of alpha(1)-adrenergic blockers (alfuzosin or tamsulosin) was administered for at least 6 months. Successful treatment was defined as improved symptoms, voiding diary, maximum flow rate and pressure-flow parameters. Patients who did not gain improvement of symptoms with pharmacological treatment were offered surgery. Results: Overall, pharmacological treatment was successful in 29/41 patients (70.7%) whereas bladder neck endoscopic incision was mandatory in 12/41 (29.3%). Conclusions: alpha(1)-Blockers were effective and safe for treating young and middle-aged men with symptomatic bladder neck obstruction. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available